Veepee kirjoitti:Jussi: Tuossa on itse asiassa paljonkin juttuja, jotka ovat KD:n perussisältöjä. Mutta Tachimura-Naihanchissa onkin eri liikeperiaatteet, kuten itse tuosta sanasta tykkäät.

"* "The position of the legs and hips in Naifuanchin no Kata is the basics of karate."

I am not arguing this point but rather taking a stance that assuming any one kata is a basic of any martial art is misleading. The position of the legs and hips are a dynamic moment to moment, circumstance to circumstance type thing where applying the principles of physiokinetics, etc. are better suited to achieve a positive outcome in a violent situation or in conflict in general. Granted, kata are teaching tools for such things and this is why I advocate not using such a specific but a more general approach so karate-ka are not locked into one aspect of many aspects.

* "Twisting to the left or right from the Naifuanchin stance will give you the stance used in a real confrontation. Twisting ones way of thinking about Naifuanchin left and right, the various meanings in each movement of the kata will also become clear."

Go back to earlier point and also consider that this may derive from the feelings of Motobu Sensei as to a specific that worked for him in his application of fighting or even self-defense. It is best a student remember this as it may or may not actually apply to that student. It is really necessary each student take a sensei’s teachings and then apply them in a manner best suited to that individual. What works for one may not work for the next person.

Ale kirjoitti: Kuvia ei pitäisi ylitulkita liikaa ja yrittää löytää niistä vahvistusta omille ajatuksilleen.

Naihancin asennosta löytyy Motobun kirjoittamaa tekstiäkin.